However, since there was opposition to the substitute prison system, the Ministry of Justice first submitted the "Bill on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates" to the Diet in order to completely revise the part of the Prison Act that stipulates the treatment of sentenced inmates. In response to the "Recommendations of the Correctional Administration Reform Council", the Ministry of Justice decided to proceed with the revision of the Prison Act. In the report, recommendations for various areas of reform were made, and notably, the full and prompt revision of the Prison Act became an integral part of realizing reforms to the correctional administration. In December 2003, the "Recommendations of the Correctional Administration Reform Council" were made public. The Ministry of Justice launched the Correctional Administration Reform Council, which consisted of private experts with the aim of conducting a broad review of correctional admission reforms. With the deaths and injuries of inmates in Nagoya Prison, which was brought to light from 2002 to 2003, problems in correctional administration concerning the treatment of the sentenced inmates became apparent. For this reason, penal institution bills, which would amend the Prisons Act, were submitted to the Diet three times since 1982, but the bills could not pass the Diet due to opposition against the substitute prison system. As a result, the Prison Act came to be misaligned with the philosophy of contemporary correctional administration in terms of promoting the inmates' re-entry into society through correctional treatment and stipulating the rights and obligations of inmates. However, after World War II, with major reforms to Japan's legal system and legal philosophy, including the establishment of the Constitution of Japan, the theory and practice regarding correctional administration developed significantly. The Prison Act, which came into effect with the Penal Code in 1908, was a highly advanced law for its time, even according to international standards, and it took into consideration the humane treatment of inmates living in penal institutions, such as food, hygiene, and medical care, as well as educational concerns for sentenced inmates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |